Review Process

1. Submission Check

• Manuscripts are screened for completeness, formatting, and relevance to conference themes.
• Plagiarism is checked using standard tools Turnitin
• Papers failing quality or formatting standards may receive a desk rejection.

The Editorial Board / Technical Program Committee (TPC) will be responsible for conducting the initial submission check, including completeness, formatting, scope relevance, and plagiarism screening.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

• Each eligible manuscript is assigned to two or more independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant domain.
• Both author and reviewer identities remain anonymous throughout the review.
• Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on:
  • Originality and innovation
  • Technical quality
  • Methodology and clarity
  • Significance of results
  • Quality of references
  • Ethical compliance

The Technical Program Committee (TPC) / Editorial Board will be responsible for assigning submitted manuscripts to qualified reviewers and initiating the double-blind peer-review process.

3. Evaluation Outcomes

Based on reviewer feedback, the Editorial/Technical Program Committee may decide:

• Accept As It Is
• Accept with Minor Revisions
• Major Revision and Re-review
• Reject

Authors are required to address reviewer comments and submit a revised version within the given deadline.

4. Final Decision

The final decision is made by the Program Chairs / Editorial Board based on:

• Review reports
• Revision quality
• Rebuttal response
• Ethical and academic standards

5. Presentation Requirement

• Accepted papers must be presented during the conference (oral or poster).
• Non-presented papers will not be considered for publication.

6. Publication

Only papers that: pass the review, adhere to ethical standards, and are presented at the conference will be forwarded for publication in the Taylor & Francis conference proceedings/journal (as applicable).